THE CROSS, STETHOSCOPE AND PEST

A DISCURSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECTION THAT PARAMENTED CHRIST AS A PHYSICIAN

Authors

  • Daniel Perico Graciano Doutorando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (PPGL/UFSCar)
  • Evandro José Paschoalino Mestrando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (PPGL/UFSCar)
  • Julio César Ribeiro dos Santos Doutorando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (PPGL/UFSCar)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61470/cadis.v2i1.75491

Keywords:

self-care, Covid-19, French Discourse Analysis

Abstract

We use some legacy concepts of Nietzsche (1993; 2013; 2016, 2017a, 2017b) and successors such as Foucault (1996; 2012; 2016) and Deleuze (2013; 2017) in an attempt to carry out a brief analysis of a projection held at the statue of Christ the Redeemer potential as a reaction to the official Brazilian discourse in the context of COVID-19. We seek to apprehend some effects of meaning as well as the constitutive lines of force of: a) Jesus Christ dressed as a doctor; b) the inscription of the lexeme “thank you” and some of its foreign lexical equivalents. The singularity of the meaning proposed in the multiplicity of the phenomenon points to two non-exclusive ways of protecting the State: in one, human resources are exalted with the subterfuge of protection to life; in another, material and patrimonial resources.

Author Biography

Julio César Ribeiro dos Santos, Doutorando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (PPGL/UFSCar)

Doutorando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (PPGL/UFSCar). Membro do Grupo de Pesquisa LEETRA-CNPq. Agência de fomento: CAPES.

Published

2026-06-24

How to Cite

Graciano, D. P., Paschoalino, E. J., & Santos, J. C. R. dos. (2026). THE CROSS, STETHOSCOPE AND PEST: A DISCURSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECTION THAT PARAMENTED CHRIST AS A PHYSICIAN. Cadernos Discursivos, 2(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.61470/cadis.v2i1.75491